Stärkung der Sehbehinderten: Der dringende Bedarf an Arzneimittelverpackungen mit Braille-Prägung in Indien

Stärkung der Sehbehinderten: Der dringende Bedarf an Arzneimittelverpackungen mit Braille-Prägung in Indien

In Indien wurde in der Rechtssache Medhansh Soni gegen die Union of India (W.P. (C) 000516/2024) vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof eine schriftliche Petition eingereicht, in der die Frage der Blindenschrift in Arzneimitteln und anderen pharmazeutischen Produkten vom Obersten Gerichtshof geprüft wurde.

Working Riders: India - Germany

Working Riders: India – Germany 

The article examines the training, skills, working conditions and regulatory differences in the employment of Indian and German working riders. It discusses the potential for migration of Indian working riders to Germany through the 2003 Indo-German Migration Agreement and highlights their contributions to the equine industry in Germany.

Jurisprudence on Bail in India: Glance through Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Jurisprudence on Bail in India: Glance through Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

In a recent legal dispute between the sportswear giant Adidas and fashion label Thom Browne, it became clear that not every stripe design on clothing constitutes a trademark infringement. Adidas filed a lawsuit. However, the Regional Court of Nuremberg-Fürth in Germany (Judgment of 06.09.2024, Case No. 4 HK O 8208/21) disagreed and dismissed the lawsuit. This case illustrates that the assessment of trademark infringement heavily depends on the specific circumstances, particularly the distinctiveness of the trademark and the level of attention of the target audience.

Thom Browne vs. Adidas: Four Stripes Are Not the Same as Three – Key Takeaways from the German Court’s Ruling

Thom Browne vs. Adidas: Four Stripes Are Not the Same as Three – Key Takeaways from the German Court’s Ruling

In a recent legal dispute between the sportswear giant Adidas and fashion label Thom Browne, it became clear that not every stripe design on clothing constitutes a trademark infringement. Adidas filed a lawsuit. However, the Regional Court of Nuremberg-Fürth in Germany (Judgment of 06.09.2024, Case No. 4 HK O 8208/21) disagreed and dismissed the lawsuit. This case illustrates that the assessment of trademark infringement heavily depends on the specific circumstances, particularly the distinctiveness of the trademark and the level of attention of the target audience.

Working Riders in Germany EU, Achern, Germany

The jurisprudence on disability in India, albeit recent, has charted an unusual course. The courts have increasingly resorted to judicial activism to interpret and reinterpret the laws, and have gone beyond the four corners of the legislations in the endeavour of delivering justice. With time, the discourse and narratives on disability coming from the corridors of the courts have noticeably evolved, with a willingness to embrace inclusion beyond the lens of mere charity and welfare.
While the formulation of laws have guaranteed the establishment of institutions to help facilitate disability access and justice, the implementation and enforcement of the same falls short of expectations.